<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This is Stupid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wdr1.com/blog/2008/06/05/this-is-stupid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wdr1.com/blog/2008/06/05/this-is-stupid/</link>
	<description>Screams in the Night</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 21:16:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben</title>
		<link>http://wdr1.com/blog/2008/06/05/this-is-stupid/comment-page-1/#comment-16293</link>
		<dc:creator>ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 19:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wdr1.com/blog/2008/06/05/this-is-stupid/#comment-16293</guid>
		<description>Tabs! Tabs! More Tabs!
More Links!
More Search Boxes!
Buttons!

Go Yahoo!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tabs! Tabs! More Tabs!<br />
More Links!<br />
More Search Boxes!<br />
Buttons!</p>
<p>Go Yahoo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Smith</title>
		<link>http://wdr1.com/blog/2008/06/05/this-is-stupid/comment-page-1/#comment-16288</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 07:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wdr1.com/blog/2008/06/05/this-is-stupid/#comment-16288</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve seen this phenomenon before. It seems like companies work so hard on the smarts of the generic search, that their vertical searches are actually worse at doing the job. I found, for example, that Google Search is often better for searching for the latest news on something than Google News Search. No idea why, but it really does seem stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen this phenomenon before. It seems like companies work so hard on the smarts of the generic search, that their vertical searches are actually worse at doing the job. I found, for example, that Google Search is often better for searching for the latest news on something than Google News Search. No idea why, but it really does seem stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

