Waifish
Tuesday, October 31st, 2006To those I’ve shared written corresponded with, it will come as zero surprise that I simply cannot spell. Likewise, anyone who’s read this blog for any length of time. (Although maybe not some.)
A while back, talking with Khayman one day, I found both he & I shared the same dirty secret: we both would use Google as our fall back spell checker.
You spelling bee winners may have no idea what I’m talking about, but the rest of you, the ones living your hidden lives in red squiggly line hell know what I mean. For me, the challenge often isn’t to spell the word right. I know I have no hope of that. Rather, for me, the challenge is to get the word spelled close enough that the spell checker can figure out what the hell it is that I’m trying to spell.
And, I’m sad to say, I’m pretty good at stumping it. For whatever reason, no spell checker, anywhere, not Word, not ispell, not aspell, can figure out my spelling of convience.
Before Google, when failed by a spell checker, I used to fall back on a combination of grep, regular expressions, and /usr/dict/words. The experience was always mixed. I knew for certain it started with ‘con’, but then so did a lot of other words. ‘vence’ has to be in there some where. Wait, no results, I guess not. Damn. Most often, I’d just page through a long list of words until I found what I was looking. Ah, convenience. There we go.
However, today it’s just a click away.
‘Did you mean convenience?’
Why, yes, I did. Thank you, Google.
The reason this works is it takes advantage of the countless interactions my fellow dysfunctional spellers have with Google, combined with a little help from their loved ones.
In the days before search engines suggested the correct spelling of things (or even today when you stump them)things typically went something like this:
User: convience
Search Engine: … Crap Results …
User: Back ButtonUser: convenaynce
Search Engine: … Crap Results …
User: Back ButtonUser: convieance
Search Engine: … Crap Results …
User: Back ButtonUser: conveyience
Search Engine: … Crap Results …
User: Back ButtonUser: conviaence
Search Engine: … Crap Results …
User: Back Button
This would happen easily a dozen more times. (You know you really messed up when you get no results.) Eventually, surrender:
User: ‘Honey, how do you spell convience?’
Honey: ‘I think it’s c-o-n-v-e-n-i-e-n-c-e, but I’m not sure. You might want to check.’
User: convenience
Search Engine: ‘ Good Results ‘
User: ‘That’s it. Thanks, honey.’
What Google does is learn from this interaction. It looks at your sequence of searches, it sees you refining your query, and by terminating your search (and probably clicking a link), figures that’s what you must have meant. So it’s not that Google has any new or improved spelling heuristics to offer a better spell checker, rather, it’s learning from actual human beings. And, turns out, that approach works really well. Hence, it can figure out convience when nobody else can.
So it surprised me earlier this evening, that not only did I trump Word’s spell checker, but Google as well. And not only that, but I was right!
Typing ”sh’ into Word, I found the familiar red squiggly appear underneath. Hmmm’ none of the suggestions are correct. A few variations with much luck. I throw ‘sh into google & it’s not hot-linked over to the definition. Hmmm, must be spelled wrong. Not even a suggestion. Damn. A few variations there, no luck. Huh.
Now I’m wondering if ‘sh is even a word or something I’ve made up. I could swear it is, though. On a lark, I try dictionary.com. Damn, no suggestions. Wait, that’s a definition. Hey, that’s what I thought it meant’ did it fix it for me? No, wait! I had it right. Double-check Google. Double-check Word. Same results. Whoa. I beat Word & Google. Those bitches at Scripps better watch out now.
Now, you may be wondering in what context I was using ‘sh. Was I looking for an antonym to describe me? (Antonym, there’s another hard one.) Actually, no. It was describe some of the sights in West Hollywood.
See, Ticketmaster’s offices are right on the Sunset Strip, so day to day, just going to coffee shop, you see a fairly eclectic collection of individuals. People who looked like they fell out of Entourage. Rockstars-to-be with their own distinct look. People who feel that some pieces of clothes, typically considered required, are, in fact, optional. (Those are the best.) Add in Halloween & the craziness ramps up a level.
Yet, the strangest personal sighting for me, still remains last week. Driving home, I saw a group of 3 guys walking down the Strip. Two where dressed normally. At least Sunset-normal. I’m not 100% sure of the details, because of the third guy. The third looked as if you had starved a Calvin Kline model, given him nothing to wear but a pair of diapers and glued a set of angle wings to his back. Honestly, I’m surprised the wind was blowing him away. Or that he wasn’t cold in that outfit.
And, honestly, if that doesn’t call for the use of the word ‘sh, I don’t know what does.
