Good-bye SBC AT&T
That’s it, I’ve joined the cellular-only pack. I’ve given up the land-line and am relying exclusively on my cell phone for voice communications. I still technically have a landline — I have a contract getting me the “Pro” level of DSL for $18/month for until Feb, but I called SBC today and have them deactivate everything else. No CallerId, no 3-way calling, no long distance, no “local long distance” (whatever the hell that was). In the end, it’ll save me about $40/month and what I pay SBC now is cheaper than what it would have been to add Internet onto Cable, so I’m fine with it.
What finally pushed me over the edge? Well, a few things:
- About two months ago, my answering machine broke. Not a big deal — I’ve had it for, what, 8 years? It used a cassette tape for Pete’s sake! When trying to replace it, I learned that’s pretty uncommon now. In fact, even just an answering machine by itself is pretty uncommon. My only choices at Fry’s where a full-fledged automated telcom system or a combo cordless/answering machine for ~$100. Screw that. I just want an answering machine.
- A few weeks ago, the static on my cordless became more pronounced, to the point where I sometimes couldn’t hear the person on the other end. (It was fine on the wired $7 Walgreens phone, so I know it wasn’t the line.)
- I looked at my most recent phone bill and noticed I pay ~$20 for DSL, ~$20 for the long distance plan, and ~$20 for “normal” service. In other words, ~$40 for a bunch of crap I hardly use.
With all that — a new answering machine, a new phone, on top of close $40/month — I decided it just wasn’t worth it, so goodbye SBC.
It’ll be interesting to see how telephony has changed in about 50 years, if the big telcos are still around, and if so, in what form. They clearly have to change as they’re built on a model accustom to having a monopoly. Customer service is usually pretty bad, adding/changing options is fairly complex, typically require some kind of satanic bundling, and worse, in most cases, to change anything, you can’t do it yourself online — you have to call in, wait on hold, etc.
Personally, considering the abuse they’ve dolled out to their customers , I’m hoping SBC/AT&T will be out of business.
April 1st, 2006 at 10:01 pm
You get DSL for $20 a month? I gotta talk to my provider…
April 1st, 2006 at 10:49 pm
Yeah. I just called up SBC/AT&T and managed to get the Pro package for $19/month, which is pretty sweet considering that gives me 6mbps downstream and 768kbps upstream. You can get as low as $12.99/month for the cheaper/slower version of the service, although long standing customers such as myself are rewarded with a $15/month fee. ;-)
April 2nd, 2006 at 3:16 am
I got the package via a link I saw on slickdeals.net. It was basically a no-brainer — same connection as Chris (higher than what I had) for a lower price.
One thing I learned canceling all my other services today: it’s better to sign-up online if you can. The same DSL package has bundle requirements (e.g., CallerID) if you order it over the phone than if you order it online. Figure that one out.
April 2nd, 2006 at 9:24 am
That is a great deal. When we moved to D.C. we got this crazy phone package (unlimited long distance, etc) because I work from home sometimes. But it basically feels like we are throwing money away.
Next time we live in LA we may to try it your way. Hope they don’t kill the DSL-only option as a death-bed attempt at saving their old business model.
April 12th, 2006 at 8:20 am
i still have a fax machine at home.
is there an internet replacement service for this so i can switch over to the non-landline generations as well?
charley
April 12th, 2006 at 10:56 am
Charley, check out efax… I think my younger bro uses that.