<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Desktop Search?  I don&#8217;t get it.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wdr1.com/blog/2004/12/14/desktop-search-i-dont-get-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wdr1.com/blog/2004/12/14/desktop-search-i-dont-get-it/</link>
	<description>Screams in the Night</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 21:16:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff</title>
		<link>http://wdr1.com/blog/2004/12/14/desktop-search-i-dont-get-it/comment-page-1/#comment-291</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2004 04:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wdr1.com/blog/?p=187#comment-291</guid>
		<description>I have the google desktop search installed.  I get the most value out of the ability to search my mail. I keep a pretty huge archive of mails around, since I like to keep my paper trails intact.  
Yes, I could search through outlook, but Google is much faster, and it feels the same as searching the web.  I know I can plug in some key terms (maybe the topic of the thread, along with a recipient or sender), and I know I&#039;ll usually get good results. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the google desktop search installed.  I get the most value out of the ability to search my mail. I keep a pretty huge archive of mails around, since I like to keep my paper trails intact.<br />
Yes, I could search through outlook, but Google is much faster, and it feels the same as searching the web.  I know I can plug in some key terms (maybe the topic of the thread, along with a recipient or sender), and I know I&#8217;ll usually get good results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

