« Dogs 1, Cats 0
My Vote »

Michael Moore or bin Laden?

Number 1
“Then, what happened was that he was impressed by the monarchies and the military regimes [of the Middle East], and he was jealous of them staying in power for tens of years, embezzling the public money without any accountability. And he moved the tyranny and suppression of freedom to his own country, and they called it the Patriot Act, under the disguise of fighting terrorism. And [George H. W.] Bush, the father, found it good to install his children as governors and leaders.”

Number 2
“[George W.] Bush and his administration were aware of what was going on. And we never knew that the commander-in-chief of the American armed forces would leave 50,000 of his people in the two towers to face those events by themselves when they were in the most urgent need of their leader.

He was more interested in listening to the child’s story about the goat rather than worry about what was happening to the towers.”

This entry was posted on Saturday, October 30th, 2004 at 5:11 pm and is filed under politics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

One Response to “Michael Moore or bin Laden?”

  1. ben Says:
    November 4th, 2004 at 4:57 pm

    So you’re saying the Iraq war isn’t good for Bush? And Halliburton? You’re saying that the Iraq war makes perfect sense and was the right thing to do, whether or not there were WMD?

    And you’re saying that we should have diverted attention away from Bin Laden so we could fight the Iraq war?

Leave a Reply