<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Round 1: Kerry</title>
	<link>http://wdr1.com/blog/2004/10/01/round-1-kerry/</link>
	<description>Screams in the Night</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 05:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: brandon</title>
		<link>http://wdr1.com/blog/2004/10/01/round-1-kerry/#comment-220</link>
		<author>brandon</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2004 04:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://wdr1.com/blog/2004/10/01/round-1-kerry/#comment-220</guid>
		<description>I declare jihad.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I declare jihad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://wdr1.com/blog/2004/10/01/round-1-kerry/#comment-219</link>
		<author>Bill</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Oct 2004 02:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://wdr1.com/blog/2004/10/01/round-1-kerry/#comment-219</guid>
		<description>Much like Iraq, my blog has become a lawless expanse of occupier haters.  

Damn hippies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much like Iraq, my blog has become a lawless expanse of occupier haters.  </p>
<p>Damn hippies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben</title>
		<link>http://wdr1.com/blog/2004/10/01/round-1-kerry/#comment-218</link>
		<author>ben</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2004 22:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://wdr1.com/blog/2004/10/01/round-1-kerry/#comment-218</guid>
		<description>It seems like terrorism is a bigger threat now that Iraq is a lawless expanse of occupier haters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like terrorism is a bigger threat now that Iraq is a lawless expanse of occupier haters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben</title>
		<link>http://wdr1.com/blog/2004/10/01/round-1-kerry/#comment-217</link>
		<author>ben</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2004 22:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://wdr1.com/blog/2004/10/01/round-1-kerry/#comment-217</guid>
		<description>Khayman is my new friend</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Khayman is my new friend</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben</title>
		<link>http://wdr1.com/blog/2004/10/01/round-1-kerry/#comment-216</link>
		<author>ben</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2004 22:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://wdr1.com/blog/2004/10/01/round-1-kerry/#comment-216</guid>
		<description>"Responding to a presidential tasking, Clarke’s office sent a memo to Rice  on September 18, titled “Survey of Intelligence Information on Any Iraq  Involvement in the September 11 Attacks.” Rice’s chief staffer on Afghanistan,  Zalmay Khalilzad, concurred in its conclusion that only some anecdotal evi­ dence linked Iraq to al Qaeda.The memo found no “compelling case”that Iraq  had either planned or perpetrated the attacks. It passed along a few foreign  intelligence reports, including the Czech report alleging an April 2001 Prague  meeting between Atta and an Iraqi intelligence officer (discussed in chapter 7)  and a Polish report that personnel at the headquarters of Iraqi intelligence in  Baghdad were told before September 11 to go on the streets to gauge crowd  reaction to an unspecified event.Arguing that the case for links between Iraq  and al Qaeda was weak, the memo pointed out that Bin Ladin resented the  secularism of Saddam Hussein’s regime. Finally, the memo said, there was no  confirmed reporting on Saddam cooperating with Bin Ladin on unconven­ tional weapons."

9/11 report - Section 10.3 - "Phase Two" and the Question of Iraq</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Responding to a presidential tasking, Clarke’s office sent a memo to Rice  on September 18, titled “Survey of Intelligence Information on Any Iraq  Involvement in the September 11 Attacks.” Rice’s chief staffer on Afghanistan,  Zalmay Khalilzad, concurred in its conclusion that only some anecdotal evi­ dence linked Iraq to al Qaeda.The memo found no “compelling case”that Iraq  had either planned or perpetrated the attacks. It passed along a few foreign  intelligence reports, including the Czech report alleging an April 2001 Prague  meeting between Atta and an Iraqi intelligence officer (discussed in chapter 7)  and a Polish report that personnel at the headquarters of Iraqi intelligence in  Baghdad were told before September 11 to go on the streets to gauge crowd  reaction to an unspecified event.Arguing that the case for links between Iraq  and al Qaeda was weak, the memo pointed out that Bin Ladin resented the  secularism of Saddam Hussein’s regime. Finally, the memo said, there was no  confirmed reporting on Saddam cooperating with Bin Ladin on unconven­ tional weapons.&#8221;</p>
<p>9/11 report - Section 10.3 - &#8220;Phase Two&#8221; and the Question of Iraq</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: khayman</title>
		<link>http://wdr1.com/blog/2004/10/01/round-1-kerry/#comment-215</link>
		<author>khayman</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2004 22:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://wdr1.com/blog/2004/10/01/round-1-kerry/#comment-215</guid>
		<description>I think the problem is that Bush keeps telling us we are safer from terrorism because of the war on Iraq despite any strong, or any, evidence that there was a connection between Iraq and terrorism.  And it's particularly unnerving that he is still doing it even after the 9/11 report and after a year of searching for connections between Iraq and terrorism to no avail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the problem is that Bush keeps telling us we are safer from terrorism because of the war on Iraq despite any strong, or any, evidence that there was a connection between Iraq and terrorism.  And it&#8217;s particularly unnerving that he is still doing it even after the 9/11 report and after a year of searching for connections between Iraq and terrorism to no avail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben</title>
		<link>http://wdr1.com/blog/2004/10/01/round-1-kerry/#comment-214</link>
		<author>ben</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2004 22:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://wdr1.com/blog/2004/10/01/round-1-kerry/#comment-214</guid>
		<description>The more I think about it, maybe they are related.

Like Iraq is in the middle east right?  And so is Afghanistan.

If you put the names together, you come up with
Osamaddam Husladen

And all the hijackers were from Iraq right?  No, wait Saudi Arabia.  Ok, maybe that part isn't related.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The more I think about it, maybe they are related.</p>
<p>Like Iraq is in the middle east right?  And so is Afghanistan.</p>
<p>If you put the names together, you come up with<br />
Osamaddam Husladen</p>
<p>And all the hijackers were from Iraq right?  No, wait Saudi Arabia.  Ok, maybe that part isn&#8217;t related.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben</title>
		<link>http://wdr1.com/blog/2004/10/01/round-1-kerry/#comment-213</link>
		<author>ben</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2004 22:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://wdr1.com/blog/2004/10/01/round-1-kerry/#comment-213</guid>
		<description>You are worse than Guiliani!  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are worse than Guiliani!  :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://wdr1.com/blog/2004/10/01/round-1-kerry/#comment-212</link>
		<author>Bill</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2004 19:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://wdr1.com/blog/2004/10/01/round-1-kerry/#comment-212</guid>
		<description>No idea, that's why I'd be curious if there's strong evidence one way or the other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No idea, that&#8217;s why I&#8217;d be curious if there&#8217;s strong evidence one way or the other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben</title>
		<link>http://wdr1.com/blog/2004/10/01/round-1-kerry/#comment-211</link>
		<author>ben</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2004 18:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://wdr1.com/blog/2004/10/01/round-1-kerry/#comment-211</guid>
		<description>The 9/11 report says that there is no connection between Saddam Hussein/Iraq and the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

You think that they are related?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 9/11 report says that there is no connection between Saddam Hussein/Iraq and the 9/11 terrorist attacks.</p>
<p>You think that they are related?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://wdr1.com/blog/2004/10/01/round-1-kerry/#comment-210</link>
		<author>Bill</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2004 16:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://wdr1.com/blog/2004/10/01/round-1-kerry/#comment-210</guid>
		<description>I'm reading the 9/11 report right now... which part of it said the Iraq is wrong?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m reading the 9/11 report right now&#8230; which part of it said the Iraq is wrong?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben</title>
		<link>http://wdr1.com/blog/2004/10/01/round-1-kerry/#comment-209</link>
		<author>ben</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2004 15:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://wdr1.com/blog/2004/10/01/round-1-kerry/#comment-209</guid>
		<description>I was watching Daily Show after the debate and they had Rudy Guiliani as a guest.  It made me sick because Guiliani basically said that Iraq and Al Qaeda were related and that it made perfect sense to invade Iraq in response to 9/11.  It's just like, this is the mayor whose city was attacked by people clearly unrelated to Saddam Hussein or Iraq, and he spouting this bullshit policy that the President put together (and the 9//11 report said was incorrect).  Goddamn!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was watching Daily Show after the debate and they had Rudy Guiliani as a guest.  It made me sick because Guiliani basically said that Iraq and Al Qaeda were related and that it made perfect sense to invade Iraq in response to 9/11.  It&#8217;s just like, this is the mayor whose city was attacked by people clearly unrelated to Saddam Hussein or Iraq, and he spouting this bullshit policy that the President put together (and the 9//11 report said was incorrect).  Goddamn!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
